↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Heart rate response during a simulated Olympic boxing match is predominantly above ventilatory threshold 2: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 254)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Heart rate response during a simulated Olympic boxing match is predominantly above ventilatory threshold 2: a cross sectional study
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s44807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, Luiz Fernando Peixinho-Pena, Rodrigo Luiz Vancini, Rafael Júlio de Freitas Guina Fachina, Alexandre Aparecido de Almeida, Marília dos Santos Andrade, Antonio Carlos da Silva

Abstract

The present study aimed to describe heart rate (HR) responses during a simulated Olympic boxing match and examine physiological parameters of boxing athletes. Ten highly trained Olympic boxing athletes (six men and four women) performed a maximal graded exercise test on a motorized treadmill to determine maximal oxygen uptake (52.2 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1) ± 7.2 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1)) and ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2. Ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2 were used to classify the intensity of exercise based on respective HR during a boxing match. In addition, oxygen uptake (V̇O2) was estimated during the match based on the HR response and the HR-V̇O2 relationship obtained from a maximal graded exercise test for each participant. On a separate day, participants performed a boxing match lasting three rounds, 2 minutes each, with a 1-minute recovery period between each round, during which HR was measured. In this context, HR and V̇O2 were above ventilatory threshold 2 during 219.8 seconds ± 67.4 seconds. There was an increase in HR and V̇O2 as a function of round (round 3 < round 2 < round 1, P < 0.0001). These findings may direct individual training programs for boxing practitioners and other athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 23%
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 62 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,205,466
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#29
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,076
of 198,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.