↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s46517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebony Boulware, Sarah Flynn, Jessica Ameling, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Jennifer Wolff, Lee Bone, David Levine, Debra Roter, LaPricia Lewis-Boyer, Annette Fisher, Leon Purnell, Patti Ephraim, Jeffrey Barbers, Stephanie Fitzpatrick, Michael Albert, Lisa Cooper, Peter Fagan, Destiny Martin, Hema Ramamurthi

Abstract

We aimed to inform the design of behavioral interventions by identifying patients' and their family members' perceived facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 66 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 50 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 21%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 69 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,786,429
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#440
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,216
of 176,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.