The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s46517 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah J Flynn, Jessica M Ameling, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Jennifer L Wolff, Lee R Bone, David M Levine, Debra l Roter, LaPricia Lewis-Boyer, Annette R Fisher, Leon Purnell, Patti L Ephraim, Jeffrey Barbers, Stephanie L Fitzpatrick, Michael C Albert, Lisa A Cooper, Peter J Fagan, Destiny Martin, Hema C Ramamurthi, L Ebony Boulware |
Abstract |
We aimed to inform the design of behavioral interventions by identifying patients' and their family members' perceived facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 253 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
Researcher | 19 | 7% |
Lecturer | 14 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 105 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 108 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,182,769
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#460
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,165
of 212,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.