↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s46517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebony Boulware, Sarah Flynn, Jessica Ameling, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Jennifer Wolff, Lee Bone, David Levine, Debra Roter, LaPricia Lewis-Boyer, Annette Fisher, Leon Purnell, Patti Ephraim, Jeffrey Barbers, Stephanie Fitzpatrick, Michael Albert, Lisa Cooper, Peter Fagan, Destiny Martin, Hema Ramamurthi

Abstract

We aimed to inform the design of behavioral interventions by identifying patients' and their family members' perceived facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 70 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 51 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 73 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,394,135
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#691
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,357
of 198,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.