↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban African Americans: perspectives of patients and family members
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s46517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Flynn, Jessica M Ameling, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Jennifer L Wolff, Lee R Bone, David M Levine, Debra l Roter, LaPricia Lewis-Boyer, Annette R Fisher, Leon Purnell, Patti L Ephraim, Jeffrey Barbers, Stephanie L Fitzpatrick, Michael C Albert, Lisa A Cooper, Peter J Fagan, Destiny Martin, Hema C Ramamurthi, L Ebony Boulware

Abstract

We aimed to inform the design of behavioral interventions by identifying patients' and their family members' perceived facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Researcher 19 8%
Lecturer 14 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 104 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 51 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 19%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 107 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,901,584
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#447
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,326
of 211,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.