↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

How nanotechnology can enhance docetaxel therapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
How nanotechnology can enhance docetaxel therapy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s46921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Zhang, Na Zhang

Abstract

Docetaxel has been recognized as one of the most efficient anticancer drugs over the past decade; however, its poor water solubility and systemic toxicity have greatly limited its clinical application. In recent decades, the emergence of nanotechnology has provided new drug delivery systems for docetaxel, which can improve its water solubility, minimize the side effects and increase the tumor-targeting distribution by passive or active targeting. This review focuses on the research progress in nanoformulations related to docetaxel delivery - such as polymer-based, lipid-based, and lipid-polymer hybrid nanocarriers, as well as inorganic nanoparticles - addressing their structures, characteristics, preparation, physicochemical properties, methods by which drugs are loaded into them, and their in vitro and in vivo efficacies. Further, the targeted ligands used in the docetaxel nanoformulations, such as monoclonal antibodies, peptides, folic acid, transferrin, aptamers and hyaluronic acid, are described. The issues to overcome before docetaxel nanoformulations can be used in clinical and commercial applications are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Student > Master 32 21%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Chemistry 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#765
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,028
of 210,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#28
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.