↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spirometry is underused in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Spirometry is underused in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s48659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Cho Yu, Sau Nga Fu, Emily Lai-bun Tai, Yiu Cheong Yeung, Kwok Chu Kwong, Yui Chang, Cheuk Ming Tam, Yuk Kwan Yiu

Abstract

Spirometry is important in the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet it is a common clinical observation that it is underused though the extent is unclear. This survey aims to examine the use of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of COPD patients in a district in Hong Kong. It is a cross-sectional survey involving four clinic settings: hospital-based respiratory specialist clinic, hospital-based mixed medical specialist clinic, general outpatient clinic (primary care), and tuberculosis and chest clinic. Thirty physician-diagnosed COPD patients were randomly selected from each of the four clinic groups. All of them had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity ratio less than 0.70 and had been followed up at the participating clinic for at least 6 months for COPD treatment. Of 126 patients who underwent spirometry, six (4.8%) did not have COPD. Of the 120 COPD patients, there were 111 males and mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 46.2% predicted. Only 22 patients (18.3%) had spirometry done during diagnostic workup, and 64 patients (53.3%) had spirometry done ever. The only independent factor predicting spirometry done ever was absence of old pulmonary tuberculosis and follow-up at respiratory specialist clinic. Age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, duration of COPD, percentage predicted FEV1, body mass index, 6-minute walking distance, and Medical Research Council dyspnea score were not predictive. We conclude that spirometry is underused in general but especially by nonrespiratory physicians and family physicians in the management of COPD patients. More effort at educating the medical community is urgently needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,078
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,779
of 210,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.