| Title |
User-centered development and testing of a monitoring system that provides feedback regarding physical functioning to elderly people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s45897 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Vermeulen, Jacques CL Neyens, Marieke D Spreeuwenberg, Erik van Rossum, Walther Sipers, Herbert Habets, David J Hewson, Luc P de Witte |
| Abstract |
To involve elderly people during the development of a mobile interface of a monitoring system that provides feedback to them regarding changes in physical functioning and to test the system in a pilot study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,293
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,966
of 210,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#28
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.