↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Embed badge What is this page?

Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Google+ Dimensions citations
Title
Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s50939
Pubmed ID
24039410
Authors

xuguang Qin, Weiguo Xiong, Li Wang, Chunpeng Lu, Enben Guan

Abstract

Use of intensive anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) potentially increases the risk of bleeding complications during percutaneous coronary intervention via the transfemoral route. Recently, the transradial access has been intensively employed as an alternative means for diagnostic and interventional procedures. A low incidence of vascular access site bleeding complications suggests that the transradial access is a safe alternative to the transfemoral technique in patients with AMI. The safety and efficacy of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with AMI has not been investigated in the People's Republic of China.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 28%
Other 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Engineering 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,899,800
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#951
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,057
of 198,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#31
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Dove Medical Press.