↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparative study of the influence of diabetes distress and depression on treatment adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in the People’s Republic of China

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Comparative study of the influence of diabetes distress and depression on treatment adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in the People’s Republic of China
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s49798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cuiping Xu, Zhang, Yan Li, Qing-zhi Liu, Hong-xia Wu, Ze-jun Xu, Xiu-juan Xue, Qing Gao

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore diabetes-related distress and depression and their influence on treatment adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Psychology 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#9,126,673
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,488
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,108
of 184,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.