| Title |
Postural stability and quality of life after guided and self-training among older adults residing in an institutional setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s47690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eeva Tuunainen, Jyrki Rasku, Pirkko Jäntti, Päivi Moisio-Vilenius, Erja Mäkinen, Esko Toppila, Ilmari Pyykkö |
| Abstract |
To evaluate whether rehabilitation of muscle force or balance improves postural stability and quality of life (QoL), and whether self-administered training is comparable with guided training among older adults residing in an institutional setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,550
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,166
of 212,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#46
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.