↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Postural stability and quality of life after guided and self-training among older adults residing in an institutional setting

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Postural stability and quality of life after guided and self-training among older adults residing in an institutional setting
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s47690
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eeva Tuunainen, Jyrki Rasku, Pirkko Jäntti, Päivi Moisio-Vilenius, Erja Mäkinen, Esko Toppila, Ilmari Pyykkö

Abstract

To evaluate whether rehabilitation of muscle force or balance improves postural stability and quality of life (QoL), and whether self-administered training is comparable with guided training among older adults residing in an institutional setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 56 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Sports and Recreations 23 13%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 62 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,550
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,166
of 212,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#46
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.