↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Practical management of NSCLC patients with long-term bevacizumab treatment: a report of four cases

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Practical management of NSCLC patients with long-term bevacizumab treatment: a report of four cases
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s45309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Dresden, Judith Herder, Codrington, Colder, Joachim Aerts

Abstract

Previous research showed that the addition of bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) to chemotherapy resulted in a significant efficacy benefit in the treatment of selected patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the occurrence and management of adverse events (AEs) during long-term maintenance treatment with bevacizumab is not well known. This report presents a descriptive analysis, including the management of AEs, of four patients with advanced NSCLC, who received a relatively long period of bevacizumab maintenance treatment. In patient 1, a 72-year-old retired man with stage cT2N2M1b NSCLC, the only AE related to bevacizumab was a grade 1 rhinorrhea. Treatment resulted in a stable disease, with duration of response of 38 months. Patient 2 had NSCLC stage cT4N3M1b and developed a cavitation and infection after the first cycle of chemotherapy and bevacizumab, which caused a temporary decrease of her quality of life. Bevacizumab therapy resulted in a partial response, with duration of response of 15 months. A 52-year-old female (patient 3) with stage T2bN2M1a NSCLC is currently under treatment and has so far received 42 cycles of maintenance bevacizumab, with stabilized response (duration of response of 29 months) and no noteworthy AEs. The last patient is a 74-year-old male farmer with NSCLC T1N0M1, whose response has lasted for more than 3 years, with until now, no AEs. Our retrospective findings of these four patients show the long-term efficacy and safety of bevacizumab treatment in a real-life setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#98
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,298
of 220,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them