| Title |
A systematic review of the effectiveness of taxes on nonalcoholic beverages and high-in-fat foods as a means to prevent obesity trends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s49659 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikolaos Maniadakis, Vasiliki Kapaki, Louiza Damianidi, Georgia Kourlaba |
| Abstract |
As part of the efforts to curb obesity, a new focus seems to be put on taxing foods that are perceived as being associated with obesity (eg, sugar-sweetened beverages and foods high in fat, sugar, and salt content) as a policy instrument to promote healthier diets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 20% |
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 22 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#824,615
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#25
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,145
of 220,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.