↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Systematic review on strength training in Parkinson’s disease: an unsolved question

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Systematic review on strength training in Parkinson’s disease: an unsolved question
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s131903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ileana Ramazzina, Benedetta Bernazzoli, Cosimo Costantino

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of strength training, performed against a different resistance from body weight, in improving motor and nonmotor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Thirteen high-quality randomized controlled trials were included. Strength training performed against external resistance is well tolerated and appears to be a suitable physical activity to improve both physical parameters and quality of life parameters of PD subjects. However, although the study intervention included strength training, only a few selected studies assessed the improvement of muscle strength. Despite the encouraging results, it is difficult to establish a correlation between strength training and the improvements made. Our review highlights the lack of common intent in terms of study design and the presence of different primary and secondary outcomes. Accordingly, further studies are needed to support the beneficial effects of different types of strength training in PD subjects and to underline the superiority of strength training in PD patients with respect to other training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 50 15%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 70 21%
Unknown 103 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 64 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 14%
Sports and Recreations 47 14%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 117 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,213,149
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#548
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,951
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.