↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

What is the effect of a shoulder-strengthening program to prevent shoulder pain among junior female team handball players?

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
What is the effect of a shoulder-strengthening program to prevent shoulder pain among junior female team handball players?
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s127854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Sommervold, Håvard Østerås

Abstract

Excessively high stresses are applied to the shoulder joint of handball players, mainly caused by overhead throwing. Shoulder pain is a significant problem among junior female team handball players and both male and female top-level team handball players in Norway. A randomized selection was performed among the best female junior teams (J 16) in the Trøndelag region of Norway in the 2014-2015 season. Three teams were randomized to the intervention group and three teams to the control group. Players in the intervention group (n=53) participated in a seven-month, three-times-a-week shoulder-muscle strength-training program, while those in the control group (n=53) participated in a comparable handball training, but did not conduct any specific strength training during the season. A strength-training program had no effect on the prevention of shoulder pain. Overall, the players reported shoulder pain, but graded the pain low on visual analog scale (VAS). Both the intervention group and the control group reported pain under 1 on VAS at baseline and posttest, and there was no significant difference within or between the groups when it came to the intensity of pain reported on VAS. A significant difference (p<0.048) was found between the groups on the sport-specific part of the quick-Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) form, but it did not fulfill the minimal demand to change and the players scored it low, something that indicates little functional problems when it comes to team handball. The intervention group was significantly stronger (p<0.008) on the push-ups test compared to the control group on the posttest. The intervention group increased the number of push-ups from 3.1 to 6.4, while the control group went from 2.3 to 3.6. Aside from this, there were no significant differences in between the groups. A shoulder-strengthening program had no effect on the prevention of shoulder pain among junior female team handball players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 22%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,952,115
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#74
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,402
of 315,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.