↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The function of medication beliefs as mediators between personality traits and adherence behavior in people with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The function of medication beliefs as mediators between personality traits and adherence behavior in people with asthma
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s49725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malin Axelsson, Christina Cliffordson, Bo Lundbäck, Jan Lötvall

Abstract

There is evidence that both personality traits and personal beliefs about medications affect adherence behavior. However, limited research exists on how personality and beliefs about asthma medication interact in influencing adherence behavior in people with asthma. To extend our knowledge in this area of adherence research, we aimed to determine the mediating effects of beliefs about asthma medication between personality traits and adherence behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,431
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,050
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.