| Title |
Meningococcal disease: changes in epidemiology and prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s28410 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiuzhi Chang, Yih-Ling Tzeng, David S Stephens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#300
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,663
of 170,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.