↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Managing the patient with osteogenesis imperfecta: a multidisciplinary approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Managing the patient with osteogenesis imperfecta: a multidisciplinary approach
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s113483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Marr, Alison Seasman, Nick Bishop

Abstract

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heterogeneous heritable connective tissue disorder characterized by low bone density. The type and severity of OI are variable. The primary manifestations are fractures, bone deformity, and bone pain, resulting in reduced mobility and function to complete everyday tasks. OI affects not only the physical but also the social and emotional well-being of children, young people, and their families. As such, medical, surgical, and allied health professionals' assessments all play a role in the management of these children. The multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of children and young people living with OI seeks to provide well-coordinated, comprehensive assessments, and interventions that place the child and family at the very center of their care. The coordinated efforts of a multidisciplinary team can support children with OI to fulfill their potential, maximizing function, independence, and well-being.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 21%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Other 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 73 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 76 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,691,194
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#420
of 933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,732
of 314,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.