| Title |
Let’s get back to work: survival analysis on the return-to-work after depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s49883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pepijn Vemer, Clazien A Bouwmans, Moniek C Zijlstra-Vlasveld, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen |
| Abstract |
Absence from work due to mental disorders is substantial. Additionally, long-term absence from work is associated with a reduced probability of return-to-work (RTW). Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent condition in Dutch occupational health care settings. An early estimate of the prognosis regarding RTW in patients with MDD could serve both as a point of departure for the identification of high-risk cases and as an instrument to monitor the course of the disorder and of RTW. In the current study, we aimed to assess the added value of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and severity of depression to predict the time to RTW. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,929,388
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#873
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,636
of 219,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.