↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bone mass density estimation: Archimede’s principle versus automatic X-ray histogram and edge detection technique in ovariectomized rats treated with germinated brown rice bioactives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Bone mass density estimation: Archimede’s principle versus automatic X-ray histogram and edge detection technique in ovariectomized rats treated with germinated brown rice bioactives
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s49704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sani Ismaila Muhammad, Ismail Maznah, Rozi Binti Mahmud, Maher Faik Esmaile, Abu Bakar Zakaria Zuki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,281
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,546
of 223,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.