↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Review of long-term adverse effects associated with the use of chemically-modified animal and nonanimal source hyaluronic acid dermal fillers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Review of long-term adverse effects associated with the use of chemically-modified animal and nonanimal source hyaluronic acid dermal fillers
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2008
DOI 10.2147/cia.s382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C Edwards, John E Fantasia

Abstract

Although only recently introduced, chemically-modified hyaluronic acid dermal fillers have gained widespread acceptance as "redefining" dermal fillers in the fields of dermatology and cosmetic facial surgery. Although hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers have a low overall incidence of long-term side effects, occasional adverse outcomes, ranging from chronic lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory reactions to classic foreign body-type granulomatous reactions have been documented. These long-term adverse events are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Chemistry 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,053,343
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#310
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,113
of 170,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.