↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Advances in drug delivery via electrospun and electrosprayed nanomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
540 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
692 Mendeley
Title
Advances in drug delivery via electrospun and electrosprayed nanomaterials
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s43575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maedeh Zamani, Molamma P Prabhakaran, Seeram Ramakrishna

Abstract

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) techniques refer to procedures that utilize electrostatic forces to fabricate fibers or particles of different shapes with sizes in the nano-range to a few microns through electrically charged fluid jet. Employing different techniques, such as blending, surface modification, and coaxial process, there is a great possibility of incorporating bioactive such molecules as drugs, DNA, and growth factors into the nanostructures fabricated via EHD techniques. By careful selection of materials and processing conditions, desired encapsulation efficiency as well as preserved bioactivity of the therapeutic agents can be achieved. The drug-loaded nanostructures produced can be applied via different routes, such as implantation, injection, and topical or oral administration for a wide range of disease treatment. Taking advantage of the recent developments in EHD techniques like the coaxial process or multilayered structures, individually controlled delivery of multiple drugs is achievable, which is of great demand in cancer therapy and growth-factor delivery. This review summarizes the most recent techniques and postmodification methods to fabricate electrospun nanofibers and electrosprayed particles for drug-delivery applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 685 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 22%
Student > Master 133 19%
Researcher 86 12%
Student > Bachelor 68 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 4%
Other 73 11%
Unknown 150 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 109 16%
Materials Science 89 13%
Chemistry 74 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 55 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 8%
Other 123 18%
Unknown 190 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#484
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,551
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.