↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recommendations for optimizing methotrexate treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for optimizing methotrexate treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , March 2017
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s131668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfonso E Bello, Elizabeth L Perkins, Randy Jay, Petros Efthimiou

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) remains the cornerstone therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with well-established safety and efficacy profiles and support in international guidelines. Clinical and radiologic results indicate benefits of MTX monotherapy and combination with other agents, yet patients may not receive optimal dosing, duration, or route of administration to maximize their response to this drug. This review highlights best practices for MTX use in RA patients. First, to improve the response to oral MTX, a high initial dose should be administered followed by rapid titration. Importantly, this approach does not appear to compromise safety or tolerability for patients. Treatment with oral MTX, with appropriate dose titration, then should be continued for at least 6 months (as long as the patient experiences some response to treatment within 3 months) to achieve an accurate assessment of treatment efficacy. If oral MTX treatment fails due to intolerability or inadequate response, the patient may be "rescued" by switching to subcutaneous delivery of MTX. Consideration should also be given to starting with subcutaneous MTX given its favorable bioavailability and pharmacodynamic profile over oral delivery. Either initiation of subcutaneous MTX therapy or switching from oral to subcutaneous administration improves persistence with treatment. Upon transition from oral to subcutaneous delivery, MTX dosage should be maintained, rather than increased, and titration should be performed as needed. Similarly, if another RA treatment is necessary to control the disease, the MTX dosage and route of administration should be maintained, with titration as needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Other 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 51 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 53 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#475,181
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#3
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,988
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them