↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pain management in patients with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
Title
Pain management in patients with dementia
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s36739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilco P Achterberg, Marjoleine JC Pieper, Annelore H van Dalen-Kok, Margot WM de Waal, Bettina S Husebo, Stefan Lautenbacher, Miriam Kunz, Erik JA Scherder, Anne Corbett

Abstract

There are an estimated 35 million people with dementia across the world, of whom 50% experience regular pain. Despite this, current assessment and treatment of pain in this patient group are inadequate. In addition to the discomfort and distress caused by pain, it is frequently the underlying cause of behavioral symptoms, which can lead to inappropriate treatment with antipsychotic medications. Pain also contributes to further complications in treatment and care. This review explores four key perspectives of pain management in dementia and makes recommendations for practice and research. The first perspective discussed is the considerable uncertainty within the literature on the impact of dementia neuropathology on pain perception and processing in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, where white matter lesions and brain atrophy appear to influence the neurobiology of pain. The second perspective considers the assessment of pain in dementia. This is challenging, particularly because of the limited capacity of self-report by these individuals, which means that assessment relies in large part on observational methods. A number of tools are available but the psychometric quality and clinical utility of these are uncertain. The evidence for efficient treatment (the third perspective) with analgesics is also limited, with few statistically well-powered trials. The most promising evidence supports the use of stepped treatment approaches, and indicates the benefit of pain and behavioral interventions on both these important symptoms. The fourth perspective debates further difficulties in pain management due to the lack of sufficient training and education for health care professionals at all levels, where evidence-based guidance is urgently needed. To address the current inadequate management of pain in dementia, a comprehensive approach is needed. This would include an accurate, validated assessment tool that is sensitive to different types of pain and therapeutic effects, supported by better training and support for care staff across all settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 527 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 166 31%
Student > Bachelor 66 12%
Student > Master 62 12%
Researcher 40 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 6%
Other 69 13%
Unknown 96 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 166 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 15%
Psychology 24 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 105 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,324,468
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#131
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,090
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.