| Title |
Comorbidity and survival of Danish breast cancer patients from 2000–2011: a population-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s47152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Gulbech Ording, Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton, Jacob Bonde Jacobsen, Mette Nørgaard, Reimar Wernich Thomsen, Peer Christiansen, Mette Søgaard |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have suggested that breast cancer survival in Denmark has improved, primarily in cancer patients without comorbidity. We therefore conducted a population-based cohort study to examine recent temporal changes in survival and mortality among breast cancer patients with different extents of comorbidity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 46% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#565
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,879
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.