↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s50213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Dultra Dias, Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio, Graziela Alves da Silva, Évelim LF Dantas Gomes, Eloisa Sanches Pereira do Nascimento, Vera Lucia Santos Alves, Roberto Stirbulov, Dirceu Costa

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with the goal of improving the functional capacity and quality of life, as well as maintaining the clinical stability of COPD sufferers. However, not all patients are available for such a program despite discomfort with their condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a home-based PR (HBPR) program on functional ability, quality of life, and respiratory muscle strength and endurance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 248 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 21%
Student > Bachelor 48 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 4%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 72 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 24%
Sports and Recreations 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 80 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,759,833
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#293
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,091
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.