↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Traumatization and chronic pain: a further model of interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Traumatization and chronic pain: a further model of interaction
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s52264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklaus Egloff, Anna Hirschi, Roland von Känel

Abstract

Up to 80% of patients with severe posttraumatic stress disorder are suffering from "unexplained" chronic pain. Theories about the links between traumatization and chronic pain have become the subject of increased interest over the last several years. We will give a short summary about the existing interaction models that emphasize particularly psychological and behavioral aspects of this interaction. After a synopsis of the most important psychoneurobiological mechanisms of pain in the context of traumatization, we introduce the hypermnesia-hyperarousal model, which focuses on two psychoneurobiological aspects of the physiology of learning. This hypothesis provides an answer to the hitherto open question about the origin of pain persistence and pain sensitization following a traumatic event and also provides a straightforward explanatory model for educational purposes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,395,439
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#912
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,164
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.