Title |
Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s50695 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erik Farin, Lukas Gramm, Erika Schmidt |
Abstract |
The objective of this exploratory study was to identify patient-related predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain for various dimensions of patient-physician communication (patient participation and orientation, effective and open communication, emotionally supportive communication, communication about personal circumstances). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 17% |
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Mongolia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
Psychology | 13 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,893,782
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#306
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,384
of 220,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.