↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A study of patient experience and perception regarding postoperative pain management in Chinese hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
A study of patient experience and perception regarding postoperative pain management in Chinese hospitals
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s53235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liu Weiran, Zhang Lei, Stephanie Mu-Lian Woo, Tang Anliu, Xie Shumin, Zhang Jing, Zhang Kai, Zhang Zhen

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the current status of postoperative pain management in the People's Republic of China's provincial-level hospitals, and the existing knowledge and opinions held by patients regarding these methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Psychology 4 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,293
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,151
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.