↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

nab-Paclitaxel as a potential partner with checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
nab-Paclitaxel as a potential partner with checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s122974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatem H Soliman

Abstract

Tumors recognized by the host immune system are associated with better survival. However, the immune system is often suppressed in patients with established tumor burden. Stimulating the immune system to detect and kill tumor cells has been a challenge in cancer therapy for some time. Recently, novel cancer immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccine therapies, have emerged as promising therapeutic approaches for many solid tumors. However, for some tumors, immunotherapy alone has not provided significant benefits, and some may even be fully resistant to immunotherapy. It has been suggested that the immune system may require "priming" before an immunotherapy can elicit an immune response. Although chemotherapies are believed to be immunosuppressive, when given at the right dose and sequence these agents may provide this "priming" effect for the immune system. In addition to direct cytotoxic killing of tumor cells, standard chemotherapeutic agents can elicit immunogenicity through various mechanisms. This review highlights the general immunomodulatory properties of chemotherapy agents. It also provides a rationale for combined therapy with nab-paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recent clinical trial data with these combination regimens in solid tumors are presented, along with a summary of ongoing trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 10%
Engineering 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,339,368
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#266
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,650
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.