↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Potential and clinical utility of stem cells in cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Potential and clinical utility of stem cells in cardiovascular disease
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, March 2010
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s5867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Korff Krause, Carsten Schneider, Kai Jaquet, Karl-Heinz Kuck

Abstract

The recent identification of bone marrow-derived adult stem cells and other types of stem cells that could improve heart function after transplantation have raised high expectations. The basic mechanisms have been studied mostly in murine models. However, these experiments revealed controversial results on transdifferentiation vs transfusion of adult stem cells vs paracrine effects of these cells, which is still being debated. Moreover, the reproducibility of these results in precisely translated large animal models is still less well investigated. Despite these weaknesses results of several clinical trials including several hundreds of patients with ischemic heart disease have been published. However, there are no solid data showing that any of these approaches can regenerate human myocardium. Even the effectiveness of cell therapy in these approaches is doubtful. In future we need in this important field of regenerative medicine: i) more experimental data in large animals that are closer to the anatomy and physiology of humans, including data on dose effects, comparison of different cell types and different delivery routes; ii) a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the fate of transplanted cells; iii) more intensive research on genuine regenerative medicine, applying genetic regulation and cell engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#56
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,659
of 102,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them