↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Safety of bronchodilators and corticosteroids for asthma during pregnancy: what we know and what we need to do better

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Safety of bronchodilators and corticosteroids for asthma during pregnancy: what we know and what we need to do better
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s52592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thorbjørn Lomholt Gregersen, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik

Abstract

Asthma is a common medical condition complicating pregnancy with potentially serious effects on pregnancy outcome. The aim of this review is to provide an update on efficacy and safety of asthma medications, primarily bronchodilators and corticosteroids, used during pregnancy with focus on pregnancy outcome, and, furthermore, to discuss limitations of available studies and point to possible improvements in future studies. A planned series of systematic searches was conducted using the PubMed database. Use of short-acting β2-agonists has generally been established as safe, and the few studies stating otherwise appear to have, perhaps critical, methodological limitations. The safety of long-acting β2-agonists remains to be further investigated, and the few available studies have methodological limitations and, therefore, provide no definite answers, although a very recent study supports the safety of add-on long-acting β2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are generally found to be safe, although further research is needed to investigate both the efficacy and safety of high dose therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Studies have reported associations between the use of systemic corticosteroids and adverse perinatal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and pre-eclampsia. This must, however, be weighed against the potential serious impact of severe, uncontrolled asthma itself on pregnancy outcome. The main obstacle to a valid interpretation of several of the available studies is the inadequate stratification for asthma severity and control. Overall, asthma in itself and not just poor asthma control poses a greater risk to pregnancy outcomes than asthma medication. Nonetheless, more studies focusing on disentangling the effects of asthma alone and asthma medications are needed. Increased use of stratified risk assessments, taking the concept of asthma severity into greater consideration, is much warranted in future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 51 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#12,693,620
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#203
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,606
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them