↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Critical evaluation of biodegradable polymers used in nanodrugs

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
14 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
Title
Critical evaluation of biodegradable polymers used in nanodrugs
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s47186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edgar Marin, Maria Isabel Briceño, Catherina Caballero-George

Abstract

Use of biodegradable polymers for biomedical applications has increased in recent decades due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, flexibility, and minimal side effects. Applications of these materials include creation of skin, blood vessels, cartilage scaffolds, and nanosystems for drug delivery. These biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles enhance properties such as bioavailability and stability, and provide controlled release of bioactive compounds. This review evaluates the classification, synthesis, degradation mechanisms, and biological applications of the biodegradable polymers currently being studied as drug delivery carriers. In addition, the use of nanosystems to solve current drug delivery problems are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 436 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 23%
Student > Master 89 20%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 87 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 74 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 11%
Engineering 46 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 8%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 105 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#484
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,551
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.