↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: green nanomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
677 Mendeley
Title
A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: green nanomedicine
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s127683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Jahangirian, Ensieh Ghasemian Lemraski, Thomas J Webster, Roshanak Rafiee-Moghaddam, Yadollah Abdollahi

Abstract

This review discusses the impact of green and environmentally safe chemistry on the field of nanotechnology-driven drug delivery in a new field termed "green nanomedicine". Studies have shown that among many examples of green nanotechnology-driven drug delivery systems, those receiving the greatest amount of attention include nanometal particles, polymers, and biological materials. Furthermore, green nanodrug delivery systems based on environmentally safe chemical reactions or using natural biomaterials (such as plant extracts and microorganisms) are now producing innovative materials revolutionizing the field. In this review, the use of green chemistry design, synthesis, and application principles and eco-friendly synthesis techniques with low side effects are discussed. The review ends with a description of key future efforts that must ensue for this field to continue to grow.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 677 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 675 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 14%
Student > Master 89 13%
Student > Bachelor 76 11%
Researcher 58 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 82 12%
Unknown 250 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 92 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 67 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 5%
Engineering 24 4%
Other 103 15%
Unknown 287 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,340,334
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#643
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,376
of 324,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#16
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.