↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Antiangiogenic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the balance of efficacy and safety

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antiangiogenic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the balance of efficacy and safety
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s35029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin-Walter Welker, Joerg Trojan

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe complication of advanced liver disease with a worldwide incidence of more than 600,000 patients per year. Liver function, clinical performance status, and tumor size are considered in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. While curative treatment options are available for early stages, most patients present with intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC, burdened with a poor prognosis, substantially influenced by the degree of liver-function impairment. Hypervascularization is a major characteristic of HCC, and antiangiogenic treatments are the basis of treatment in noncurative stages, including interventional and pharmacological treatments. Currently, the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor sorafenib is still the only approved drug for HCC. Further improvements in survival in patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC may be anticipated by both multimodal approaches, such as combination of interventional and systemic treatments, and new systemic treatment options. Until now, the Phase III development of other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced HCC has failed due to minor efficacy and/or increased toxicity compared to sorafenib. However, promising Phase II data have been reported with MET inhibitors in this hard-to-treat population. This review gives a critical overview of antiangiogenic drugs and strategies in intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC, with a special focus on safety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Other 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Lecturer 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,159,569
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#162
of 1,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,498
of 207,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them