↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Real-world treatment patterns and opioid use in chronic low back pain patients initiating duloxetine versus standard of care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Real-world treatment patterns and opioid use in chronic low back pain patients initiating duloxetine versus standard of care
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s50323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Scott Andrews, Ning Wu, Shih-Yin Chen, Xia Yu, Xiaomei Peng, Diego Novick

Abstract

To describe the use of pain medications in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) after initiating duloxetine or standard of care (SOC [muscle relaxants, gabapentin, pregabalin, venlafaxine, and tricyclic antidepressants]) for pain management, pharmacy and medical claims from Surveillance Data, Inc (SDI) Health were analyzed. Adult patients with CLBP who initiated duloxetine or SOC between November 2010 and April 2011 were identified. Treatment initiation was defined as no pill coverage for duloxetine or SOC in the previous 90 days. Included patients had no opioid use in the 90 days before initiation. Propensity score matching was used to select patients with similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for duloxetine and SOC cohorts. Compliance with index medication was assessed via medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) for 6 months after initiation. The proportion of patients receiving opioids and days on opioids after index date were assessed, and regression models were estimated to compare opioid use between cohorts. A total of 766 patients initiated duloxetine and 6,206 patients initiated SOC. After matching, 743 patients were selected for the duloxetine (mean age 57 years; female 74%) and SOC (mean age 57 years; female 75%) cohorts, respectively. Of the duloxetine cohort, 92% started on or below recommended daily dose (≤60 mg). The duloxetine cohort had significantly higher MPR (0.78 versus [vs] 0.60) and PDC (0.50 vs 0.31), were less likely to use opioids (45% vs 61%), and had fewer days on opioids (median 0 vs 7 days) than the SOC cohort (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, the duloxetine cohort initiated opioids later than the SOC cohort (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.89). CLBP patients initiating duloxetine had better compliance with initiated medication and were less likely to use opioids than those initiating SOC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,553,433
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,557
of 1,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,915
of 221,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.