↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Fall-related admissions after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty - cause of concern or consequence of success?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Fall-related admissions after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty - cause of concern or consequence of success?
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s52528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoffer Jørgensen, Henrik Kehlet

Abstract

Total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common procedures in elderly persons, who are at potential increased risk of postoperative fall due to loss of muscle strength and impaired balance. Fast-track surgery with early mobilization and opioid-sparing analgesia have improved outcomes after these procedures, but early mobilization and short hospitalization length of stay (LOS) could potentially increase the risk of falls after discharge. We investigated injuries, circumstances, and the timing of fall-related hospital admissions 90 days after fasttrack THA and TKA.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Other 10 13%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,554,843
of 11,441,008 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#621
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,226
of 188,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#31
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,441,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.