↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimizing therapeutics in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis: a review of drug efficacy, dosing, and mechanisms of action

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing therapeutics in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis: a review of drug efficacy, dosing, and mechanisms of action
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/btt.s53007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavitha Damal, Emily Stoker, John F Foley

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating neurological disorder that affects nearly 2 million adults, mostly in the prime of their youth. An environmental trigger, such as a viral infection, is hypothesized to initiate the abnormal behavior of host immune cells: to attack and damage the myelin sheath surrounding the neurons of the central nervous system. While several other pathways and disease triggers are still being investigated, it is nonetheless clear that MS is a heterogeneous disease with multifactorial etiologies that works independently or synergistically to initiate the aberrant immune responses to myelin. Although there are still no definitive markers to diagnose the disease or to cure the disease per se, research on management of MS has improved many fold over the past decade. New disease-modifying therapeutics are poised to decrease immune inflammatory responses and consequently decelerate the progression of MS disease activity, reduce the exacerbations of MS symptoms, and stabilize the physical and mental status of individuals. In this review, we describe the mechanism of action, optimal dosing, drug administration, safety, and efficacy of the disease-modifying therapeutics that are currently approved for MS therapy. We also briefly touch upon the new drugs currently under investigation, and discuss the future of MS therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#89
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,684
of 226,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.