Title |
The effects of poly L-lactic acid nanofiber scaffold on mouse spermatogonial stem cell culture
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s45535 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Neda Eslahi, Mahmoud Reza Hadjighassem, Mohammad Taghi Joghataei, Tooba Mirzapour, Mehrdad Bakhtiyari, Malak Shakeri, Vahid Pirhajati, Peymaneh Shirinbayan, Morteza Koruji |
Abstract |
A 3D-nanofiber scaffold acts in a similar way to the extracellular matrix (ECM)/basement membrane that enhances the proliferation and self-renewal of stem cells. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effects of a poly L-lactic acid (PLLA) nanofiber scaffold on frozen-thawed neonate mouse spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) and testis tissues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,971
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,155
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#86
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.