↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Small-aperture corneal inlay in presbyopic patients with prior phakic intraocular lens implantation surgery: 3-month results

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Small-aperture corneal inlay in presbyopic patients with prior phakic intraocular lens implantation surgery: 3-month results
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s50397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tukezban Huseynova, Tomomi Kanamori, George O Waring, Minoru Tomita

Abstract

We report a series of three case reports of KAMRA inlay implantation procedures in presbyopic patients with a history of prior phakic intraocular lens implantation surgery. Three-month results showed a two to five-line improvement for uncorrected near visual acuity. The absolute uncorrected near visual acuity change for case 1 was from J4 to J2, for case 2 was from J6 to J4, and for case 3 was from J10 to J5. No significant change of uncorrected distance visual acuity was observed in all three cases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,207
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,169
of 210,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#95
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.