↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

What is this page? Embed badge

The influence of socioeconomic status on women's preferences for modern contraceptive providers in Nigeria: a multilevel choice modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Google+ Dimensions citations
Title
The influence of socioeconomic status on women's preferences for modern contraceptive providers in Nigeria: a multilevel choice modeling
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s51852
Pubmed ID
24353406
Authors

Olatunde Aremu

Abstract

Contraceptives are one of the most cost effective public health interventions. An understanding of the factors influencing users' preferences for contraceptives sources, in addition to their preferred methods of contraception, is an important factor in increasing contraceptive uptake. This study investigates the effect of women's contextual and individual socioeconomic positions on their preference for contraceptive sources among current users in Nigeria.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Unspecified 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Unspecified 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,265,309
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#391
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,580
of 307,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Dove Medical Press.