↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The influence of socioeconomic status on women's preferences for modern contraceptive providers in Nigeria: a multilevel choice modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
The influence of socioeconomic status on women's preferences for modern contraceptive providers in Nigeria: a multilevel choice modeling
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s51852
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olatunde Aremu

Abstract

Contraceptives are one of the most cost effective public health interventions. An understanding of the factors influencing users' preferences for contraceptives sources, in addition to their preferred methods of contraception, is an important factor in increasing contraceptive uptake. This study investigates the effect of women's contextual and individual socioeconomic positions on their preference for contraceptive sources among current users in Nigeria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Social Sciences 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#610
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,076
of 320,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.