↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bispectral index value correlates with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury patients

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Bispectral index value correlates with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury patients
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s130643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi, Made Wiryana, I Gusti Ngurah Mahaalit Aribawa, Christopher Ryalino

Abstract

Accuracy of consciousness level assessment is very important. It may determine and influence further clinical decisions, thus influences patients' outcomes. The widest method in determining the level of awareness is the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Despite its common use, GCS scores obtained by one clinician may differ from others depending on their interpretations and past experience. One of the tools used to assess the level of consciousness objectively is bispectral index (BIS). The aim of this study was to identify the correlation between BIS and GCS score in patients with traumatic brain injury. A total of 78 patients who were admitted to emergency room for traumatic brain injury were included in this study. One observer evaluated the GCS of all patients to minimize subjectivity. Another investigator then obtained the BIS values for each patient. Spear-man's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine whether GCS correlated with BIS value. In 78 patients, the BIS was found to be significantly correlated with GCS (r=0.744, p<0.01). The BIS values increased with an increasing GCS. Mean BIS values of mild, moderate, and severe head injury were 88.1±5.6, 72.1±11.1, and 60.4±11.7, respectively. In this study, a significant correlation existed between GCS and BIS. This finding suggests that BIS may be used for assessing GCS in patients with traumatic brain injury. However, the scatters of BIS values for any GCS level may limit the BIS in predicting GCS accurately.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 17 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#150
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,873
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.