| Title |
Nonpharmacological interventions to treat physical frailty and sarcopenia in older patients: a systematic overview – the SENATOR Project ONTOP Series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s132496 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Lozano-Montoya, Andrea Correa-Pérez, Iosief Abraha, Roy L Soiza, Antonio Cherubini, Denis O’Mahony, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 94 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,337,649
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#133
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,985
of 328,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.