↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s41431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Ghezzi, Elio Scarpini, Daniela Galimberti

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age-dependent neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia. The early stages of AD are characterized by short-term memory loss. Once the disease progresses, patients experience difficulties in sense of direction, oral communication, calculation, ability to learn, and cognitive thinking. The median duration of the disease is 10 years. The pathology is characterized by deposition of amyloid beta peptide (so-called senile plaques) and tau protein in the form of neurofibrillary tangles. Currently, two classes of drugs are licensed by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of AD, ie, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for mild to moderate AD, and memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, for moderate and severe AD. Treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine aims at slowing progression and controlling symptoms, whereas drugs under development are intended to modify the pathologic steps leading to AD. Herein, we review the clinical features, pharmacologic properties, and cost-effectiveness of the available acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, and focus on disease-modifying drugs aiming to interfere with the amyloid beta peptide, including vaccination, passive immunization, and tau deposition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Other 14 7%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 9%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 47 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,055,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#452
of 2,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,119
of 321,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.