↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical differences among the elderly admitted to the emergency department for accidental or unexplained falls and syncope

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Clinical differences among the elderly admitted to the emergency department for accidental or unexplained falls and syncope
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s127824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Pasqualetti, Valeria Calsolaro, Giacomo Bini, Umberto Dell’Agnello, Marco Tuccori, Alessandra Marino, Alice Capogrosso-Sansone, Martina Rafanelli, Massimo Santini, Eugenio Orsitto, Andrea Ungar, Corrado Blandizzi, Fabio Monzani

Abstract

It is difficult to distinguish unexplained falls (UFs) from accidental falls (AFs) or syncope in older people. This study was designed to compare patients referred to the emergency department (ED) for AFs, UFs or syncope. Data from a longitudinal study on adverse drug events diagnosed at the ED (ANCESTRAL-ED) in older people were analyzed in order to select cases of AF, syncope, or UF. A total of 724 patients (median age: 81.0 [65-105] years, 66.3% female) were consecutively admitted to the ED (403 AF, 210 syncope, and 111 UF). The number of psychotropic drugs was the only significant difference in patients with AF versus those with UF (odds ratio [OR] 1.44; 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.77). When comparing AF with syncope, female gender, musculoskeletal diseases, dementia, and systolic blood pressure >110 mmHg emerged as significantly associated with AF (OR 0.40 [0.27-0.58], 0.40 [0.24-0.68], 0.35 [0.14-0.82], and 0.31 [0.20-0.49], respectively), while valvulopathy and the number of antihypertensive drugs were significantly related to syncope (OR 2.51 [1.07-5.90] and 1.24 [1.07-1.44], respectively). Upon comparison of UF and syncope, the number of central nervous system drugs, female gender, musculoskeletal diseases, and SBP >110 mmHg were associated with UF (OR 0.65 [0.50-0.84], 0.52 [0.30-0.89], 0.40 [0.20-0.77], and 0.26 [0.13-0.55]), respectively. These results indicate specific differences, in terms of demographics, medical/pharmacological history, and vital signs, among older patients admitted to the ED for AF and syncope. UF was associated with higher use of psychotropic drugs than AF. Our findings could be helpful in supporting a proper diagnostic process when evaluating older patients after a fall.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 27%
Other 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,239,390
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,252
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,094
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.