↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Test-retest repeatability of strength capacity, aerobic power and pericranial tenderness of neck and shoulder muscles in children - relevant for tension-type headache

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Test-retest repeatability of strength capacity, aerobic power and pericranial tenderness of neck and shoulder muscles in children - relevant for tension-type headache
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s46344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birte Tornøe, Lars L Andersen, Jørgen H Skotte, Rigmor Jensen, Gunvor Gard, Liselotte Skov, Inger Hallström

Abstract

Frequent or chronic tension-type headache in children is a prevalent and debilitating condition for the child, often leading to medication overuse. To explore the relationship between physical factors and tension-type headache in children, the quality of repeated measures was examined. The aim of the present study was to determine the test-retest repeatability of parameters determining isometric neck and shoulder strength and stability, aerobic power, and pericranial tenderness in children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 22%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,904,244
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#960
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,077
of 198,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.