| Title |
Ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s133637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Rabiolo, Mariacristina Parravano, Lea Querques, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Adriano Carnevali, Riccardo Sacconi, Teresa Centoducati, Stela Vujosevic, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques |
| Abstract |
Fluorescein angiography (FA) is a useful examination in patients suffering from diabetic retinopathy (DR). Traditional angiograms explore 30°-50° of the retina at once; however, visualization of peripheral retina is fundamental in order to assess nonperfused areas, vascular leakage, microvascular abnormalities, and neovascularizations. In order to expand the field of view, wide-field and ultra-wide-field imaging has been developed allowing to image up to 200° of retinal surface in one single shot. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the role of the most recent technique of ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography in DR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Peru | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Cuba | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 44% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,501,077
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#643
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,212
of 325,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.