↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adalimumab treatment in Crohn's disease: an overview of long-term efficacy and safety in light of the EXTEND trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Adalimumab treatment in Crohn's disease: an overview of long-term efficacy and safety in light of the EXTEND trial
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s35163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amon Asgharpour, Jianfeng Cheng, Stephen J Bickston

Abstract

The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Adalimumab is a subcutaneous anti-TNF agent indicated for use in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and those with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. In both diseases, it can be used for both induction of remission and for maintenance of remission. This review focuses on its use in Crohn's disease as described in the EXTEND (Extend the Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab through Endoscopic Healing) trial. Several clinical trials using traditional instruments to measure clinical response have had endoscopic substudies looking for endoscopic healing. The EXTEND trial is the first to use mucosal healing on endoscopy as a primary endpoint for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and baseline ulcerative disease treated with continuous adalimumab. In this well designed trial, the primary endpoint was narrowly missed, but the secondary endpoints further the notion that mucosal healing should be a more mainstream measure of drug efficacy. How this will translate from clinical trials to the clinic is not yet clear, but identifying noninvasive markers for mucosal healing, and understanding the implications of mucosal healing for safety, resource utilization, and quality of life are all worthy targets for further study. The aim of this review is to understand the role of mucosal healing, safety profile, and efficacy in patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, with particular attention to adalimumab and the EXTEND trial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Other 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,684,367
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#113
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,230
of 203,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.