↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In vivo tomographic imaging with fluorescence and MRI using tumor-targeted dual-labeled nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
In vivo tomographic imaging with fluorescence and MRI using tumor-targeted dual-labeled nanoparticles
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s52492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Zhang, Bin Zhang, Fei Liu, Jianwen Luo, Jing Bai

Abstract

Dual-modality imaging combines the complementary advantages of different modalities, and offers the prospect of improved preclinical research. The combination of fluorescence imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides cross-validated information and direct comparison between these modalities. Here, we report on the application of a novel tumor-targeted, dual-labeled nanoparticle (NP), utilizing iron oxide as the MRI contrast agent and near infrared (NIR) dye Cy5.5 as the fluorescent agent. Results of in vitro experiments verified the specificity of the NP to tumor cells. In vivo tumor targeting and uptake of the NPs in a mouse model were visualized by fluorescence and MR imaging collected at different time points. Quantitative analysis was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of MRI contrast enhancement. Furthermore, tomographic images were also acquired using both imaging modalities and cross-validated information of tumor location and size between these two modalities was revealed. The results demonstrate that the use of dual-labeled NPs can facilitate the dual-modal detection of tumors, information cross-validation, and direct comparison by combing fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) and MRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Engineering 6 13%
Chemistry 4 8%
Materials Science 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#765
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,099
of 320,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#22
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.