Title |
Non-adherence to topical treatments for actinic keratosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s47126 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bav Shergill, Simon Zokaie, Alison J Carr |
Abstract |
There is limited information on the patterns of use, adherence rates, and factors that impact adherence with topical treatments for actinic keratosis (AK). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 34% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,790,212
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#551
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,139
of 321,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.