↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/clep.s129886
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johnny Kahlert, Sigrid Bjerge Gribsholt, Henrik Gammelager, Olaf M Dekkers, George Luta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Researcher 17 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 73 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 85 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,521,329
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#334
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,719
of 328,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.