↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Intradermal air pouch leukocytosis as an in vivo test for nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Intradermal air pouch leukocytosis as an in vivo test for nanoparticles
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s51628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Vandooren, Nele Berghmans, Chris Dillen, Ilse Van Aelst, Isabelle Ronsse, Liron Limor Israel, Ina Rosenberger, Jörg Kreuter, Jean-Paul Lellouche, Shulamit Michaeli, Erica Locatelli, Mauro Comes Franchini, Miren K Aiertza, Laura Sánchez-Abella, Iraida Loinaz, Dylan R Edwards, Louis Shenkman, Ghislain Opdenakker

Abstract

The need for test systems for nanoparticle biocompatibility, toxicity, and inflammatory or adaptive immunological responses is paramount. Nanoparticles should be free of microbiological and chemical contaminants, and devoid of toxicity. Nevertheless, in the absence of contamination, these particles may still induce undesired immunological effects in vivo, such as enhanced autoimmunity, hypersensitivity reactions, and fibrosis. Here we show that artificial particles of specific sizes affect immune cell recruitment as tested in a dermal air pouch model in mice. In addition, we demonstrate that the composition of nanoparticles may influence immune cell recruitment in vivo. Aside from biophysical characterizations in terms of hydrodynamic diameter, zeta potential, concentration, and atomic concentration of metals, we show that - after first-line in vitro assays - characterization of cellular and molecular effects by dermal air pouch analysis is straightforward and should be included in the quality control of nanoparticles. We demonstrate this for innate immunological effects such as neutrophil recruitment and the production of immune-modulating matrix metalloproteases such as MMP-9; we propose the use of air pouch leukocytosis analysis as a future standard assay.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Materials Science 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,088
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,829
of 320,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#52
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.