| Title |
Pseudotyping exosomes for enhanced protein delivery in mammalian cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s133430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conary Meyer, Joseph Losacco, Zachary Stickney, Lingxuan Li, Gerard Marriott, Biao Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 19% |
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,660,989
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#355
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,446
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.